Near-Death Experiencer Shares Secrets from Beyond the Veil


Search “Diane Goble” in your device’s ebook store or Google “ebooks by Diane Goble”

or read a sample and purchase directly from publisher (click on title below)

Watch for a New Smashwords Discount Coupon every month

Reincarnation and the Evolution of Consciousness (2013) – 16,000 words – $1.99

Author reading Chapter “The Challenge of Being Fully Human

Author on BlogTalkRadio with Pamela Edmunds’ Bridge Between Two Worlds – 2/12/14

Author on BlogTalkRadio with Pamela Cummins’ The Love Channel Show – 4/15/14

The Path to Peace & Joy (2013) – 15,290 words – $1.99

Author reading Chapter “Chakras

How to Die Consciously: Secrets from Beyond the Veil (2011) – 52,520 words – $2.99

Author reading Chapter “End of Life Conversations

Conversations with a Near-Death Experiencer – Book 1 (2010) – 95,840 words – $3.99

*** MARCH SPECIAL “50% Off” – Use code FJ47W at check out ***

More Conversations with a Near-Death Experiencer – Book 2 (2010) – 70,340 words – $2.99

*** MARCH SPECIAL “50% Off” – Use code ZQ22G at check out ***

Sitting in the Lotus Blossom (2010) – 64,100 words – $2.99

Author reading Chapter “The Wounded Planet

• • • • • • •

The following CDs are suggested in some of Diane’s ebooks

Vocals by Diane Goble • Music by Shapeshifter

Sample and downloads available by clicking on links below

happinessCDHappiness Journey (download) – $1.99

lotusmeditationLotus Meditation (download) – $1.99

Relax1-4Relax2-4Relaxation Exercise 1 & 2 (downloads) – $3.99

ClearingPastCDClearing the Past (download) – $1.99

Physician-assisted suicide addressed in new book by Near-Death Experiencer

Beyond the Veil

Our Journey Home

by Diane Goble

We’re all going to die some day so–

  • shouldn’t we all be looking into this event instead of living in denial and pretending it only happens to other people?

  • shouldn’t we at least have some tools available to us so when it does, however it does, we’re prepared and know what to do next?

  • shouldn’t we prepare ourselves to take care of and comfort a loved one who is terribly ill or elderly and facing their own death?

That’s what I thought when I first began writing this book, which is what I was asked to do when I decided to come back into my body during my near-death experience while drowning during a white water river rafting accident in 1971.



 The answers to all those questions you have about death, dying and what comes next are between these covers.

The paperback, published by Cosmic Creativity, is now available on and at most major book retailers.

Posting reviews or sharing your thoughts about Beyond the Veil on retailer websites, like, may contribute to the evolution of human consciousness and are much appreciated by all those who contributed to the publication of this valuable book.

… a way for individuals to consciously prepare for what’s to come, and to better understand the life in their death, and what happens next. Anyone can benefit from this book, so keep it handy. You may use it more often than you think.

~ P.M.H. Atwater, L.H.D., researcher and author of Near-Death Experiences: The Rest of the Story and We Live Forever: The Real Truth About Death

There is no easy way to bring up the conversation of death but Goble’s book shows us why this is one of the most important discussions that we can have.

~ Josie Varga, author of Visits from Heaven and Visits to Heaven

Ultimately learning how to be fully present and conscious for the one who is passing is one of the greatest gifts you can offer someone you love.

~ JoAnn Chambers, Vibrational Sound Healer and co-author of The Sonic Keys: Sound, Light & Frequency; DNA Activation, and The Secret of Abundance

This is a conversation you must have with yourself…

and probably should have with all family members–

not that you need to have all the answers right now, but just to get you started thinking about these important questions before it’s necessary to know the answers so there won’t be any family disagreements in the heat of a crisis. We all need to have these conversations about the end of our lives and what we do want and don’t want as far as treatment options, including invasive procedures, aggressive therapies, prescription drugs, palliative care, hospice,  and when and where we choose to die, depending on the circumstances and based on our own values, traditions and beliefs. Ideally we need to review our choices every 5 years as we get older, if we have health changes, lifestyle changes, because we often make different decisions as our age and circumstances change. We need to think about situations like–

If your heart stopped right now, what is your family’s plan?

Does anyone know where your important papers, passwords, contacts, valuables are kept and what you want done with them and who to contact after you’re gone?

If your persistent headaches led to a diagnosis of an inoperable brain tumor and a diagnosis of 6 months or less to live, would you consider the Death with Dignity option (do you know if it’s available in your state/country, what the requirements are)?

Are you aware that your Emergency Contact is not necessarily your Healthcare Representative unless that person is also designated in your Advance Healthcare Directive/Living Will?

If your spouse had a sudden illness requiring hospitalization, what things would you have to do that you wouldn’t ordinarily do? What if the person had been in an accident and was in a coma?

Do you really know what it means if you say do everything to save me?

Knowing that at some point you will die, how do you hope your death will be? Have you told anyone? Have you contemplated your own death?

Have you considered how you would manage becoming a full-time caregiver for a severely ill child or an elderly parent?

If you are entering your dying process, have you reconciled your life and found peace of mind or do you fear what lies ahead?

Beyond the Veil: Our Journey Home

was written by Diane Goble, a near-death experiencer who became a spiritual teacher, based on what she learned during her journey home and was asked to bring back to share with as many people as she could.
Her primary message is– We Don’t Die!
Her book is a resource manual, chock full of information about the options that are available to us as we are preparing ourselves for transition or being a caregiver for someone who is in the dying process.
It is a training manual based on the author’s professional course to teach caregivers to be Transition Guides for their dying loved ones or patients.
It is a personal workbook with plenty of Notes pages for those soon departing as they are guided through the practice of the Art of Conscious Dying and writing their own Personal Transition Guidebook.
It is printed in large type.

For those of you who need more, go to Diane will be offering classes and webinars with special guests, and private consultations about end-of-life issues and conversations in the near future. If you would like to receive updates, fill out the following form:

The Slippery Slope of Physician Assisted Dying/Suicide

Sisters Sunset 8/21/13

I’ve been reading (pro and con) articles, blogs, opinions, press releases, news stories, surveys, law suits, legislation, etc. about Death With Dignity Laws and the attempts to pass them from all over the world for the past year and as a result of all I’ve learned I’ve come to the conclusion that there is a slippery slope when it comes to physician assisted dying. In all of the states in the U.S., Canada and other countries where such laws have been passed (in no particular order):

1. There is an increase in palliative and hospice care, and services have expanded and improved to include transitions

2. Medical students are now being trained in pain management and end or life care

3. More doctors are having conversations at the request of their patients about end-of-life care, regardless of whether they get paid

4. More people are having conversations with their families about what they want at the end of their lives

5. More people are talking about death and dying as if it is part of life not as a tragic event nobody wants to think about or plan for

6. More people are getting to die at home in their own warm bed surrounded by their family as they wish instead of in a cold, impersonal ICU hooked up to machines and tubes, surrounded by strangers who wear masks

7. More people are dying peacefully rather than being scared to death about death

8. More people are filling out Advance Healthcare Directives

9. More people are working on their Bucket List, reconciling their lives, asking forgiveness, expressing gratitude, and preparing themselves mentally, emotionally and spiritually for their journey out of their body

9. More emergency room physicians are complying with Advance Healthcare Directives and life or death situations are handled the way even the unresponsive patient wants not the way protocol dictates

10. More people are filling out POLST (physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) forms with their primary physician and are being spared drastic resuscitation measures they don’t want at end of life

11. More chronically disabled people are expressing optimism that they will have more control over their end of life decisions

12. More people are meditating, eating healthier and exercising to improve the quality of the rest of their lives instead of subjecting themselves to invasive life-prolonging, often futile, medical treatments in their last days

13. Fewer people are accumulating huge medical bills at end of life for unwanted invasive medical procedures

14. Fewer dying people are resorting to drastic, messy, inept suicide attempts or homicide/suicide acts that often end in failure and horror for the whole family

15. Physicians are accepting responsibility for being with their patients until the end of their lives instead of abandoning them when there is nothing more they can do medically or when the patient decides to stop medical treatment but wants to continue to be monitored

16. Fewer people are trying impose their morals and values on other people about their end of life choices

17. More people who are near death are requesting assistance from their physicians in case their dying process becomes unbearable… fewer of them actually take the medication because palliative and hospice care are keeping them comfortable longer and allowing more people to experience a more peaceful transition

Good laws need to be written to protect physicians from prosecution and the dying from being killed against their will while allowing release from their body by their consent.

We have to guard against extremes but abide by reason and compassion.

Death with Dignity – October 2012

Overview of National News – October 2012

(NOTE: For list of articles quoted, go to Categories: Assisted Dying & Euthanasia: Assisted-Death Debate – October 2012)

The major news throughout October has been about the vote in a few days in Massachusetts for a Death With Dignity law, similar to the proven-effective laws in Oregon and Washington. The laws provide similar guidelines and safeguards for those dying patients who want to request a prescription from a physician to hasten their deaths if they decide to and for those physicians who may write the prescriptions.

Is it a perfect law, no. Do some of the opponents have legitimate concerns, certainly. Do they have a right to impose their beliefs on others, no. Is it a work in progress, yes. We need rational debate not fear tactics and threats of being banished to hell to consider all sides of the issue.

I found it interesting that I only came across relevant articles from 12 states and Washington, DC in October. Most articles mentioned the growing debate about the Massachusetts ballot issue to be voted on November 6… however, the one Illinois article discussed the controversy over a proposed  assisted-death bill being introduced in Quebec and the one article from North Carolina had the anti-euthanasia advocate from Canada claiming fraud and abuse at Dignitas in Switzerland. They may be testing the waters.

In Oregon, where the Death with Dignity law has already passed, some of its financially-strapped hospitals are now facing take-over by the Catholic healthcare systems whose execs tell the town folks nothing will change… well, except that abortions (unless to save the life of the mother) and writing prescriptions for a life-ending drug won’t be allowed “on their dime.”

The people of Ashland kicked them out but they continue to target other towns in Oregon and Washington. According to a Catholic Bishop in Wisconsin, supporting a woman’s right to reproductive freedom (abortion); death with dignity (euthanasia); important scientific research (stem cell research); and marriage equality for gay and lesbian citizens are all “intrinsically evil” and, of course, we are all going to hell in a handbasket.

BTW, a gay bashing group from Mississippi sent the opponents of the Death with Dignity law in Massachusetts $250,000 to help them with their campaign. It became a hot news item and they were guilted into sending at least some of it back, although they continue to accept contributions from the Catholic Church (whatever happened to separation between Church and State?) and other dubious supporters for the media blitz this week leading up to voting day.

Unfortunately, it seems their media blitz is working because the gap that according to polls was a slam dunk for passage has been shrinking the past week. Don’t take anything for granted if you want this to pass. Get out and vote, and tell your friends to vote their choice.

It seems that in some states people are beginning to look at this issue and talk amongst themselves about how they want to die when their time comes. If it passes in Massachusetts, some claim it will open the floodgates for other states to get it on the ballot. One writer prophesized: “Coming soon to your state!”

The next states getting close to having a Death with Dignity law on the ballot are New Jersey, Hawaii, Vermont and Texas… and, who knows, maybe even Montana will make it official soon!

People in those other 38 states need to wake up and pay attention not just to what’s happening in Massachusetts, but all over the world on this issue because this is an idea whose time has come. And it’s not going to go quietly away.

Overview of International News – October 2012

In Australia, euthanasia advocate Dr. Philip Nitschke is urging Tasmania’s Upper House MPs to open their minds to what he calls progressive legislation. A discussion paper on legalising voluntary euthanasia is due out in the next few months. A euthanasia bill will have to pass the Upper House before it can go to parliament next year. The issue of gay marriage has only just been dismissed from the Tasmanian Parliament but already Christian groups are preparing for the next moral battle while MLC Paul Harriss has dismissed the debate as a Green-led agenda.

Actor and Bell Shakespeare theatre director John Bell who supports the rights of patients to choose to end their life says it is not a morose or negative cause. ”We’re not about embracing death … we are about celebrating life. Once the quality of life is gone, life is not worth very much,” he said. ”I don’t want to reach that stage of being incontinent, helpless, totally dependent. It’s a dreadful way to end a life that’s been a very happy and blessed one.” John said that often children of parents are particularly torn by how to care for their dying loved one. “They often feel guilty about wanting the parent to go, and therefore not being able to let them go and not knowing how to do it.”

Sarah Edelman, clinical psychologist and vice-president of Dying with Dignity, NSW, says that under current law it is legal to starve oneself to death over several weeks in a hospital bed and to commit suicide using violent means. (In fact, it is difficult to end one’s own life peacefully without appropriate medication or ”insider knowledge”). However, it is illegal to access medical help to die peacefully when faced with intolerable suffering and no prospect of recovery, or when dying is slow, painful and undignified. Politicians should be asked why this is an acceptable state of affairs.

From a woman in Sydney– “Right now there are two people in my life wanting to die. My 19-year-old university student friend Josh made his intentions really, really clear last week. He stood in front of a train. It didn’t kill him and he is vigorously being kept alive in intensive care. My 86-year-old dad, Bob, who lives in an aged care facility, regularly quotes the Ol’ Man River song ‘I’m tired of living, but scared of dying.’ So with all this talk about the possibility of legalising euthanasia, what’s the difference between Josh’s suicide attempt and assisted suicide should my dad Bob want it?

David Leaf, a Dying with Dignity NSW board member, said mounting evidence that supported legalising euthanasia was being ignored. He said assisted dying programs worked, with no evidence of heightened risk for groups considered vulnerable to euthanasia, including the elderly, uninsured, poor, physically disabled and mentally ill.

Dr Leaf criticised Father Brennan and “other Catholic lobbyists” for using emotive terms like “legal killing,” “suicide,” “death by doctor,” and “lethal injection” in their input into the debate. “I’m not anti-Catholic, but I’m anti-bullshit,” Dr Leaf said.

More than 200 Australian doctors have banded together to call for law reform on voluntary euthanasia, but few of them would want to administer a fatal drug dose. “But doctors wouldn’t be administering the drug, because that responsibility could instead lie with the patient who would self-administer the dose, which is what happens in countries where it is legalised,” Dr Marr said.”This is not about the suffering of doctors, it’s about the suffering of the patients and that’s what the doctors signed up to our organisation recognise.”

When the swimming champion Murray Rose died on a quiet Sunday last April, he was at peace. His wife, Jodi, believes palliative care and a supported death at home helped create that peace. “There’s no greater transition than death – and you want it with dignity,” she said. “He loved being at home so I knew in general that if there was any way he could pass away at home that was our ideal scenario. I did not do it alone. I could not have done it alone,” she said. The provision of palliative care in NSW is at a critical juncture: historically underfunded services are struggling to meet increasing demand while federal funding appears to be drying up. The Roses’ experience is unusual in NSW, according to the Palliative Care Plan. One third of people who die of cancer and 90 per cent of those who die predictable deaths from other conditions do not receive palliative care.

And this is one of the problems everywhere it’s being debated. People say palliative care can help relieve the pain and suffering that often comes with the dying process. First, palliative care isn’t available everywhere, in fact hardly anywhere– it’s a new field. Second, there aren’t enough trained medical people to administer and implement palliative care programs to handle the growing need (think Baby Boomers). And third, what is available is expensive and mostly not covered by insurance– including Medicare, which will pay the MD but not the nurses, the social workers, the caregiver assistants, or the chaplains necessary to make it truly a palliative care program.


In Belgium, deaths from “voluntary euthanasia” are approximated at 2 percent, – 2,000 annually. At a recent conference in Brussels, a Belgian doctor reported that organ transplants are being done on euthanized patients and that Belgium leads in this practice. Dr. Van Raemdonck reported that nine successful lung transplants from “voluntary euthanized” patients have been performed since 2007.

If a person who is an organ donor is brought into the emergency room and declared brain dead, his body can be kept alive by machines until his organs can be harvested. What’s the difference if a person who is dying wants to be euthanized at some point so that his still viable organs can be harvested for transplant? I’m sure there will be outcries from the right that people will want to euthanize granny and sell her lungs when this gets around.

A filmmaker researching a film about dying interviewed two doctors who told him, “Unusually, the Belgian palliative-care movement and right-to-die movement developed alongside each other. Today, following legalisation in 2002, both palliative care and euthanasia are available alongside each other in the mostly Catholic-run public hospitals as part of an integrated system of end-of-life care. Under Belgian law there two key preconditions: incurable illness and unbearable suffering. The euthanasia usually takes place in the presence of friends and family, often accompanied by prayers, music and even champagne.

In the city of Hasselt, Fr Marc Desmet, a kindly palliative-care consultant and Jesuit priest, brought us to meet an older woman, Delphine Van Hoebrock, the evening before she was euthanised. He held her hand gently as he checked whether she had any last doubts. She seemed remarkably certain and sanguine about her choice, although I couldn’t help sensing some loneliness too. It was both emotionally charged and strange to spend time with Delphine on the eve of her chosen death. Heartbreakingly sad also, even though we knew her only fleetingly. Even an assisted death is a sad and lonely affair, it seems, no matter how much it is desired.


It looks looks Canada is set to become the next country to allow assisted dying. The Quebec legislature passed a report early in October, after two years of work from the Dying With Dignity Committee. The action was part of the Parti Quebecois’ election agenda (Parti Quebecois is the minority government in Quebec at present) and likewise had the backing of the all-party National Assembly committee.  The Liberals have remained silent on the issue.

Nonetheless, the Criminal Code still prohibits medically assisted-suicide. Social services junior minister Véronique Hivon asserts that Quebec can pass the law without the support of Ottawa as “Quebec has jurisdiction over health and also over professional qualifications” which “gives us the confidence to introduce this medical aid in dying in our bill.” The passing of the law will place Canada under the umbrella of other countries who exercise physician assisted-suicide such as Switzerland, Belgium and the Netherlands along with a few American states.

Wanda Morris, Executive Director of Dying With Dignity-Canada, believes Canada has a clean slate where” we can introduce any criteria for eligibility we choose, and we can adopt whatever safeguards we feel are necessary.” Canadians can look to the decision of B.C. Supreme Court Justice Lynn Smith who had access to detailed testimony from both sides, experts from around the world and the results of cross-examinations from both teams of lawyers.

Among her conclusions: there is no slippery slope; the safeguards work. “In my opinion, opponent’s presentation of data from Oregon and Netherlands is generally incomplete, frequently filled with factual inaccuracies and distortions, and often meant to construct a false empirical foundation for what is essentially a moral opposition to the practice of physician-assisted death.”

Ottawa, on the other hand, has filed its arguments in an appeal of a B.C. decision that struck down the prohibition on doctor-assisted suicide, arguing the trial judge was wrong to conclude the law is unconstitutional. In documents filed with the B.C. Court of Appeal, the government says the law reflects a reasonable belief that allowing assisted suicide would put vulnerable people at risk of being coerced or even forced to end their lives. The government says the law reflects Parliament’s desire to discourage and prevent suicide in all cases, and it should be up to lawmakers, not the courts, to decide if that needs to change.

Quebec grassroots group Living with Dignity director Linda Couture expressed alarm at how fast the government is moving, noting the new government hopes to have a bill passed by June next year.

Consistent with Canadian law, most of the country’s medical governing bodies are opposed to assisted death. So taking a principled stand, even within the quiet confidence of colleagues, can trigger career-ending attacks from within.They have to worry as a physician how the public, their patients, and their colleagues are going to view them. Whenever you depart from the traditional viewpoint in medicine, it’s going to be uncomfortable.

Some doctors fear the hot-button issue is drawing focus away from a different, and widely used form of end-of-life care. Dr. Romayne Gallagher works with the palliative care program at Providence Health Care, which aims to alleviate suffering for the dying. However, even though Canada has offered palliative care since 1975, it is still largely unavailable to most Canadians.

So medically assisted death is still not an option in Canada, but it’s  only a matter of time before it is. And we’re talking a few more years, not decades. But Canadians are already finding ways to spare themselves unbearable suffering, because there are organizations out there willing to educate them about the alternatives. And those organizations are watching with interest as several court cases wind their way through the justice system — cases which could turn the tide.

Meg Westley witnessed two people die. One died painfully and slowly of the cancer ravaging her body. Another was relatively well, but decided to hasten his death before Huntington’s disease took its terrible toll. Both, she believes, were abandoned by Canada’s ban on assisted suicide.

“I think it’s barbaric that even though people want to go, we let them suffer on,” said Westley, a University of Waterloo communications professor and president of the right-to-die advocacy group Dying with Dignity. “It is about compassion,” she said. “Give them the assistance so they don’t have to suffer if that’s their choice.”

The wrenching experience was made worse knowing Nagui Morcos died when he still had months, even a couple years of relatively decent health to enjoy with his wife, family and friends. But Morcos knew he could not get the help needed later when he was no longer physically able to end his life on his own. Watching life slip away from this cheerful and passionate man who talked repeatedly of the great moments he would miss reaffirmed the unfairness of Canada’s law against doctor-assisted suicide.

Gloria Taylor, the 64 year-old Okanagan woman who had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease and fought to change Canada’s law on assisted dying, died in early October. She was gradually losing control of her muscles and feared dying of the disease. Together with two others, she launched a lawsuit claiming that the Canadian Charter of Rights implied a right to choose the time of her death. Judge Lynn Smith agreed and struck down the law, but suspended her judgement until after the inevitable appeal. However, she did give Ms Taylor a personal exemption from the law, making her the only person in Canada allowed to have recourse to doctor-assisted suicide.The Association says Taylor’s death was sudden: she developed a severe infection resulting from a perforated colon. Given the acute nature of the illness, she did not need to seek the assistance of a physician to end her life.

An Ontario man also with ALS ended his life this month. Part of his final statement reads as a kind of social treatise on the role of government in the final choices of Canadians. “Any liberal, democratic system respectful of human rights should provide for a legal and humane way to exit this life at a time chosen by a rational person and with appropriate safeguards and assistance. Unfortunately, the Government of Canada and Canada’s Supreme Court do no do so. While Canada’s law criminalizing assisted death may have been conceived to protect life, it can have the effect of doing just the opposite. I am now looking for ways to die that I must implement myself, that is while I am still sufficiently strong to take all the necessary steps myself. Having in mind the nature of ALS, this will force me to terminate my life earlier than would otherwise be the case.”

“People are dying too early because of laws against assisted dying. People are killing themselves while they still have the ability to do it.” Wanda Morris, Executive Director of the national organization, Dying With Dignity, advocates with great passion and compassion the urgent need to legalize assisted dying for individuals who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness or a progressive incurable physical illness.

What choices are they left with? With the blasé patter of an airline attendant explaining the protocols of oxygen mask use, the 71-year-old retired librarian removes a microwave bag and pulls it over her head, her face shrouded beneath clear plastic, her features blurring, her graying bun compressed into a soft helmet. Slowly, her fingers begin to pinch a seal around her neck using Velcro strips she attached at the open end of the bag. Her voice muffled and faint, she points to the spot where a tube is to be inserted. “I would probably use helium,” she declares, deadpan. “A few deep breaths and you fade off.”  She is Ruth von Fuchs of the Right to Die Society of Canada who says, “No one wants to die alone. Most just want someone there to hold their hand.” Von Fuchs is a death midwife.

The Social Science Research Laboratory at the University of Saskatchewan – the only facility of its kind in Canada – created the Taking the Pulse survey in its group analysis lab, which includes multiple departments from across the Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Their research found that 59 per cent of Saskatchewanians surveyed believe they should have the option of doctor-assisted suicide when the end is nigh.


A senate committee in Colombia voted 10-4 to send a proposed measure to regulate euthanasia to the full Senate for consideration. If approved the measure would be sent to the Colombian House of Representatives for a vote.

A representative of the Colombian bishops, Father Pedro Mercado Cepeda, pronounced that “No circumstance can make it legally acceptable to intentionally cause the death of a human being.  The right to life is constitutionally inviolable.”

Now here’s a country where people are lying dead in the streets due to the drug cartels and Father Pedro here is making a moral issue of people who probably have no healthcare to begin with and just want out of the misery of their lives. Take care of the people and stay out of politics Father!


The Law Commission in India has made a recommendation to the government to initiate measures to enact a comprehensive law on passive euthanasia, subject to certain safeguards. “It’s not objectionable from a legal and constitutional point of view,” the commission, which advises the government on legal issues, said.

Dr. Pallavi A. Roshi says  “This decade has brought a significant change in a doctor’s point of view. Many of us have changed the focus from ‘only care’ to ‘cure and comfort’ to ‘only comfort,’ when cure is impossible. Although doctors should strive to extend life and decrease suffering, they must also accept death as a defining characteristic of life. Sometimes, so-called heroic methods may lead to needless suffering instead of preventing death. So, when the incurability of a disease is confirmed, there begins the journey of palliative care to make the end of life easy, and assuring the patient of a dignified death.”


From Ireland… Sadly, cases like Jenny Grainger’s, who had to stand by and watch her mother stop eating and drinking to have a better death than she might otherwise have had, are not uncommon. Barbara Grainger (75), who had a motor neuron disease and was a lifelong supporter of euthanasia, told her daughter that she wanted to die and asked for her help. Barbara also wanted the tragic story of her death made public in the hope of helping bring about a change in the law which governs people’s right to choose when and how they die. She wanted to go to Switzerland to Dignitas, but unfortunately she wouldn’t be able to swallow the barbiturate pill given there. So she decided that she would die through a voluntary refusal of food and fluids.

Too often, we see accounts of people travelling abroad to die, or attempting to end their lives at home, sometimes alone to avoid implicating loved ones. For this reason, as well as the many people who suffer unbearably against their wishes, many people in Ireland are campaigning for a change in the law.

One writer says, “if we agree that people like Barbara Grainger  should not have to suffer against her wishes at the end of her life, which the vast majority of us do, then we must continue to fight for a law in the UK which allows dying, competent adults the choice of a peaceful and dignified assisted death. No one should have to contemplate travelling thousands of miles for assistance, or weeks refusing food or water to have what they consider a good death.”

Another writer goes on about all the reasons it’s a bad idea, slippery slope and all, and proclaims– “The vulnerable and sick need support and reassurance they won’t suffer alone. It is sometimes difficult for families to give this support, so there is a duty on society to provide it. The compassionate response to suffering is not to encourage suicide, but to offer the palliative care and psychological support the sick need to help them live.

Perhaps in a perfect world. Once again, I’d ask where is that support? In most cases, it’s either not available or too expensive for the people who need it most. We need to meet people where they are, not in some hoped for future.

“Regardless of their religious or political background, this is an issue which affects everyone and politicians need to take a stand and help bring about the change in the law, which currently robs people of their right to choose,” says Jenny Grainger. She has been inundated with messages of support since she shared the heartbreaking story of how her family stood by her mum when she chose to end her own life through the voluntary refusal of food and fluids. Because she did not have the option of a quick and pain-free death through euthanasia, Barbara lingered for 24 days before her heart finally stopped.

An Irish assisted-suicide campaigner will not face prosecution over his visit to an elderly multiple sclerosis sufferer (MS) who took a fatal overdose to end her life because there is “insufficient evidence.” Tom Curran, who says he will risk up to 14 years in an Irish prison to assist his partner Marie Fleming — also a MS sufferer — to die at a time of her choosing, was interviewed by British police following the death of a wheelchair-bound grandmother of five. Ann Veasey (71) died in August 2011 at her nursing home in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, after she overdosed on pills she had bought online from China.

On the face of it, there is an overwhelming case to permit assisted suicide. For the greater, if not far greater, part, it would apply to people who have lived a life, made it into the upper reaches of the average span, and, were it not for a debilitating condition, would want to cling to life. Why should somebody in that position be held prisoner by nothing more than a societal taboo? Why should that person not be afforded the comfort of knowing that they were ultimately existing on their own terms? On the other hand, there is an argument that any introduction would lead down the slippery slope to elderly people being pressured to consent to their own death.

We live in a society that values choice. We choose our careers, our partners and almost every aspect of our lives. It is then a strange situation that we are ultimately unable to choose the nature of our deaths beyond a small number of options. As the Tony Nicklinson and Marie Fleming cases reach their conclusions in the media and the courts, we may have to reassess this strange paradox and address how we ourselves want to die, on our own terms or on the terms of our final illness?


From Italy, an online newspaper aimed at providing the last breaking news on welfare policies, an article about the advance of euthanasia in The Netherlands.

Pioneer in Europe, with a law issued in 2002, the Netherlands explicitly guarantee to its citizens the right to interrupt treatment if they want to or can no longer stand their disease. The same right has been then recognized in Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland. This latter rejected a few days ago a proposal to ban assisted suicide to foreigners in its territory, thus confirming the outcome of a popular referendum held last year. After all, there is no risk that the country can be invaded by ‘mild death’ tourists: in the last few years, the number of sick persons – mainly from France, Germany and the UK –  emigrating to Switzerland to appeal to the assisted suicide law for a decent and aware end of life (even in the most serious cases of depression) was cut by half.

If in 2006 there were 199 cases of euthanasia among extra-EU citizens, in 2010 this number dropped to 97. Perhaps because, over the years, other European countries have authorized treatment interruption in different ways, while in others euthanasia is still a topic in political and social debate. This is the case of France, where President Hollande announced a palliative care reform last summer. Not the case of Italy, though. “Euthanasia” still remains an unrepeatable word here. Meanwhile, Vatican’s spokespersons in Parliament, probably alarmed by the refusal of any form of therapeutic obstinacy opposed by cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, push for the approval of a law on the living will with dubious constitutional outlines.


Retired film director Michael Winner has considered ending his life at a euthanasia clinic after doctors told him he has just 18 months to live. The moviemaker from New Zealand, who has battled ill health in recent years, revealed this summer that liver specialists have given him between 18 months and two years and he now admits the prognosis led him to look into the controversial Dignitas institution in Switzerland. The 76-year-old opened up about his research  insisting he was put off by the amount of paperwork required to go through with assisted suicide.

He says, “I checked Dignitas on the computer and you need to go through so much. It’s not a walk-in death. You don’t just go in and say ‘Here I am, do your worst.’ You have to go through a whole series of papers and re-examinations just to die. You have to fill in forms and things and you have to fly there, go back twice…

“I think the idea that people should be able to have an assisted suicide is absolutely highly proper. Why should people elongate life when it’s no good for them? People should have the right to terminate their own life. If you’re dead, you’re dead, so who cares? I’m very happy to snuff it. I’ve had enough time on earth. I’d be happy if someone gave me the plug to pull.”

“If you have the right to die, it’s a completely different feeling than if you do something that is not legal,” Anne Mohrdieck said. “It’s different for me and it’s different for the people around me. It is to die with dignity. “Everyone has different abilities to cope with the suffering. If my ability does not allow me to have a quality of life in any way, and I choose a better option would be to go out … then I’d be enraged if that possibility would be taken from me or wouldn’t be given to me.”
Mary Stewart says euthanasia is just a euphemism for hetero-homicide – getting someone to kill you. After 30 years as a nurse, Mrs Stewart says it will confuse the role of health professionals, who swear an oath to heal and provide comfort.New Zealand medical practitioners anecdotally report having been asked by their patients for assistance in dying gracefully, and many of them have complied. However, rather than following a protocol with built-in safeguards and safety standards, the process is unregulated. For patients and family members who decide to take things into their own hands, the outcome could be devastating.
Advanced care-planning initiatives and advance directives in New Zealand already address patients’ objectives and desires for refusing medical treatment in emergent situations. If those conversations expand to include aid-in-dying options for the terminally ill, then patients have a true grasp of the entire spectrum available to them. Further, it allows family members to discuss options and support each other, rather than have secret conversations and fear of legal prosecution if they follow a loved one’s requests. Medical practitioners have clearly defined processes in place, and medical protocols they must follow to comply with legislation. This protects medical practitioners from having to guess at an appropriate dosage or surmise which drugs to use. The process is defined and has paperwork that shows protocols are followed. There is no legal ramification for following their patient’s wishes. Further, medical practitioners may opt out of the process, which protects their rights to their own personal beliefs about death and dying.
And under the headline of Euthanasia Opens Floodgates of Nastiness— Once assisted suicide becomes legal, anyone old and frail and rich will be expected to do the decent thing by whoever stands to profit from their death. Athinly-disguised legal murder will become routine, especially as lack of respect for the old, and the belief that they don’t have any quality of life anyway, is underscored by the ease with which you can ”help” them die.***From Russia, On the death ofbard Ada Yakusheva– I had heard that Yakusheva was battling cancer, but what I hadn’t realized is that her doctors had denied her pain medication, on the basis of some bureaucratic error. When her relatives confronted them about her suffering, they were curtly told, “everyone suffers.” Only on her final day alive was Yakusheva allowed some dignity and peace. A hospice doctor had her transferred to a palliative care facility. She was given a shot of morphine, curled up, and slept for what was probably the first time in a month. The following morning, Yakusheva passed away peacefully.

The other issue here is, of course, the attitude of the actual doctors. Most are simply not trained to make their patients comfortable. Once it is clear that the patient is dying – a lot of them simply stop caring. And even though palliative care is certainly a major aspect of healthcare in modern Russia, many doctors still resist any urge to call a colleague who works in that field, if only because they don’t want anyone taking over their case. Yakusheva’s doctors went as far as to accuse her relatives of trying to use the dying woman’s condition to score drugs for themselves. The fact that this happened to a well-known personality speaks to the enormity of the problem.


In Scotland, there is concern that the Swiss assisted-suicide clinic Dignitas helped 217 Britons to die in 10 years. It is understood that the Dignitas Clinic in Switzerland has more than 900 Britons on its books and has ended more than 20 lives a year on average since it was set up ten years ago. The new figures from Dignitas and progress of Ms MacDonald’s latest bill has led anti-assisted suicide campaigners to warn against a change in the law.


South Africans are discussing how voluntary euthanasia is legal for citizens of Holland and Belgium, and doctor-assisted dying is legal in a few states in the US, and in Switzerland. Lord Joffe is confident it will be legal in the UK in the not too distant future. When asked which he thought was easier — voluntary euthanasia or doctor-assisted dying? He felt it was easier to get someone else to kill you, than to kill yourself. On reflection, the reporter  could only agree. Yet no matter whether it’s voluntary euthanasia or doctor-assisted dying you’re after, the driving force behind legalising it is simply dignity in death.


According to a new study by the University of Zurich, Switzerland, one in four people who accompany someone to commit assisted suicide suffer massive psychological distress. Researchers at the university spoke to 85 people who went with a family member or close friend to an EXIT euthanasia clinic one to two years after the assisted death of loved ones. A quarter suffered from post traumatic stress disorder while 16 percent had depression. Five percent were found to have long-term grief. The results state that problems can surface 14 to 24 months later and that a death not from natural causes was a heavy burden for those who supported the deceased. Although the research didn’t include a direct comparison with the effects of a natural death on a loved one, the study was compared to others. This showed the researchers that post traumatic stress disorder was more common for people close to an assisted suicide case rather than a natural death.

They don’t mention the other 54% who apparently weren’t heavily burdened or traumatized– and I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the whole ordeal of having to take one’s dying loved one somewhere to die, as opposed to being in one’s own bed in one’s own home surrounded by loved ones, has a lot to do with the agony of it all.


Dr. Peter Saunders, a former general surgeon and CEO of Christian Medical Fellowship, a UK-based organization with 4,500 UK doctors and 1,000 medical students as members, says the current British Suicide Act is thereby shown to remain fit for purpose. Through its blanket prohibition on all assistance with suicide, it continues to provide a strong deterrent to the exploitation and abuse of vulnerable people whilst giving both prosecutors and judges discretion in hard cases. It strikes the right balance, is clear and fair and does not need changing. The Swiss vote means that the small number of British people travelling to Switzerland to end their lives will probably continue but we should continue to resist any calls from pressure groups to weaken the law here in the UK.

A poll conducted by Christian Concern surveyed more than 150 MPs across all parties and found that only 29 per cent supported proposals to introduce assisted suicide, whilst 59 per cent were opposed to the move and 12 per cent were undecided. The poll also found that the majority of MPs believe that a change in the law would result in an increase in the number of suicides, and 72 per cent felt that it would place vulnerable people under pressure to end their lives prematurely. Almost 60 per cent were of the opinion that the current economic climate would result in more patients opting for an assisted death to avoid placing a financial burden on family members and carers.

Regarding the case of Tony Nicklinson, who chose to starve himself to death after losing his last appeal for euthanasia in September, a reporter from the Christian Institute wrote: The case of a man who campaigned for doctors to be allowed to kill him will not go to the Court of Appeal, High Court Judges have ruled. Lord Justice Toulson said the case was “plainly a matter for Parliament.” Tony Nicklinson, who suffered from a condition known as ‘locked-in syndrome’, wanted doctors to be able to end his life.

Now judges at the High Court have turned down an application by Jane Nicklinson to be made party to the proceedings. Lord Justice Toulson said: “We do not consider that the proposed appeal has any real prospect of success. Mrs Nicklinson has vowed to appeal the decision. However a second locked-in sufferer, whose case was heard alongside that of Mr Nicklinson, has been given leave to appeal.

Meanwhile, Jane Nicklinson says, “It is not easy to admit feeling relieved that the love of your life, your soul mate, has died.” But that is exactly how Jane Nicklinson feels about husband Tony Nicklinson, the assisted suicide campaigner who died of natural causes six weeks ago. Mrs Nicklinson understands that she might come across as callous or uncaring, especially by those who opposed her family’s very public battle to change the law so that locked-in syndrome sufferer Tony could be legally helped to end his life. But for anyone who has cared for a loved one with an intolerable terminal or degenerative condition, Mrs Nicklinson may just be articulating what many find too difficult to admit.

The widow is expected to call this week for Scotland to become the first part of the UK to change the law on assisted suicide. She will appear at a conference in Edinburgh with the MSP Margo MacDonald, who has already tried and failed to make assisted suicide legal north of the border. The conference will also hear from Ludwig Minelli, founder of Dignitas, the assisted dying organisation in Switzerland. Among Ms MacDonald’s new proposals is a suggestion that a “licensed facilitator”, a so-called “friend at the end”, would have to be present when someone was at the point of ending their own life. The facilitator could be a doctor, social worker, or close friend but not a relative or anyone who stood to gain from the death.

Exactly what I’ve been proposing– Transition Guides, death midwives, doulas. It doesn’t have to be a physician since they are so attached to Hippocrates and don’t understand how important healing of the soul is at the end of life. We need a new specialty and a new perspective about the end of life.

Now doctors have a new worry– Doctors are required to provide access to a patient’s records under the Data Protection Act 1998 if a ‘subject access request’ has been made. However, new GMC draft guidance for fitness-to-practise decision-makers, due to be published later this year, advises it is a criminal offence for doctors to encourage or assist a person to commit or attempt suicide. GPs should explain this to patients when faced with demands for medical records for this purpose, the guidance says. The GMC says that GPs are required to provide medical records under the Data Protection Act. However, if a GP suspects this will be used for the purposes of assisted dying, the GP will be contravening the 1961 Suicide Act by providing the medical records.

Which means if you plan to go to Dignitas, don’t tell your doctor when you ask for your medical records.

Dignitas has seen an average of 18 British citizens coming through its door each year since 2002 and many have chosen to be very open about what compelled them to travel abroad to die. Having control over the timing of their death and avoiding a painful, lingering end have been the over-riding wishes of people like Dr Anne Turner, Peter Smedley and Jackie Meacock as they made their final journey to Zurich. For those who travelled with them, there was always the fear of prosecution but, to date, no-one who accompanied any of the 182 Britons has been prosecuted.

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg last year, ruled that while there is a “Human Right” to suicide, the state has no obligation to provide citizens with the means to commit suicide. Grégor Puppinck, the director of the European Centre for Law and Justice explained, “The Court notes that the vast majority of member States place more weight on the protection of an individual’s life than on the right to end one’s life and concludes that the States have a broad margin of appreciation in that respect.”

During a panel discussion with Human Rights solicitors, Richard Stein observed that the argument that there can never be adequate safeguards to protect the vulnerable  is being used as a “smokescreen”, and, equally, the notion that disabled people cannot exercise their free will to die because it reduces the value of disabled lives is a “hugely patronising” one.

All this reflects a big shift towards secular thinking and individual autonomy as well as growing worries about the medicalised, miserable and costly way of death that awaits many people in rich countries. Assisted suicide typically gains overwhelming public support; legislators, pro-family lobbies, churches and doctors’ groups tend to be more squeamish. They fear that legal, easy-to-get assisted suicide will have dire social and moral effects.

More from Dr. Peter Saunders– Now that the Tony Nicklinson case is over and the next assisted suicide bills (from Falconer in the House of Lords and Macdonald in Scotland) are not to be debated until next year one could be forgiven for thinking that the relentless media pressure for the legalisation of euthanasia might relent for a few weeks. But no – first we have the pronouncements of junior health ministers Norman Lamb and Anna Soubry giving their support for the legalisation of assisted suicide and now the BBC, in its role as cheerleader for assisted suicide, is making an international news story about the fact that it is ten years since the first Briton went to the Dignitas suicide facility in Zurich to kill himself.

As fall-outs between pro-life campaigners go, this one has yet to surface, but it could turn for the worse. The tension is over whether or not the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is being used as a form of euthanasia. In June Dr Patrick Pullicino, a neurologist, claimed that the Pathway was an “assisted death pathway”. According to the doctor, patients are being placed on the LCP without clear evidence that they are close to death, while the sensationalised Daily Mail headline ran: “Top doctor’s chilling claim: The NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year” – where 130,000 is the total number of patients who are put on the LCP out of the 450,000 that are terminally ill. In other words, the majority of people who are close to death are not put on the Pathway.

Since it was rolled out across the country in 2004, it has received three glowing audits, the endorsement of this Government and, just this month, the public support of 20 respected organisations representing millions of patients, carers, doctors and nurses. Yet last week the Association of Palliative Medicine bowed to pressure from a lobby of Roman Catholic doctors, pro-life groups, some media and a small number of distressed and grieving relatives to order a review into the Pathway. Was this a victory for patients’ rights or capitulation to media hysteria and public misunderstanding?

** ** **

This will be the last month I’ll be listing all the articles that come to my email box because it just takes way too much of my time. I will, however, continue to read new articles and contribute to the debate about aid-in-dying from my perspective.


Assisted Death Debate – News from July 2012

End-of-Life discussions about Assisted Dying/Suicide/Euthanasia in news articles, blogs, videos from the left, right and center during the month of July 2012. This is a place to find out what’s being talked about around the world as we sort out this highly emotional and controversial issue.

Become informed, open your mind,  join in the discussions. Our leaders need to know what people are thinking and we need to know what our leaders are considering in terms of laws. These are conversations we all need to have!


What is your opinion of assisted suicide for the terminally ill? Live Poll

Living with Dying: Major Myths about Death With Dignity by Melissa Barber (2/27/12)

the Front Door to Healthcare – Coming to a hospital near you: physician-assisted suicide  (7/2/12)

Salon – Where’s our right to die? by Santiago Wills (7/3/12)

HuffPost-Religion – A Scientific Honoring of Death by Rev. Michael Dowd (7/8/12)

Medical Talk – Ethics: Physician Assisted Suicide (7/9/12)

Secondhand Smoke – Swiss proves no brakes assisted suicide by Wesley J. Smith (7/9/12) – Take Docs Out of Assisted Suicide Equation? by Emily P. Walker (7/11/12)

National Right to Life News Today – Pro-Euthanasia Forces at Work at Home and Abroad: The latest in the battle over assisting suicide by Jennifer Popik, J.D. (7/11/12)

The Economist – Time to Die (7/12/12)

White Coat Notes – Chelsea Conaboy: Assisted dying, without the doctor? Ethicist says physicians can help without prescribing lethal dose (7/12/12)

New Europe Post online – Dying in Court by Peter Singer (7/12/12)

The Economist – The quality of death: Grim reapings (7/15/12)

Compassion & Choices – The Evolving State of Physician-Assisted Suicide by Jamie Joyce, The Atlantic 7/16/12

David C. Stolinsky Blog – Coming Soon: A “Central Mechanism” for Assisted Dying (7/16/12)

Girl with a Cane – Changes to laws in Canada Regarding Physician-Assisted Suicide (7/19/12)

Playing the Devil’s Advocate – An Intriguing Objection to Euthanasia for Old White People (7/19/12)

BioEthics @ TIU – Physicians’ role in assisted dying by Steve Phillips (7/19/12)

Death with Dignity National Center – The Need for Carefully Crafted Death with Dignity Laws by Melissa Barber (7/19/12)

Secondhand Smoke – EU court won’t impose euthanasia by Wesley J. Smith (7/19/12)

LifeNews – 14% of all Dutch deaths involve euthanasia, assisted suicide by Wesley J. Smith (7/19/12)

Secondhand Smoke – Nitschke doubles down in Death-on-Demand by Wesley J. Smith 7/20/12

National Right to Life News Today – Right-to-Die movement has split into two warring camps, says Nitschke by Michael Cook (7/20/12) – Pro-Euthanasia movement splitting into two warring factions by Dr. Peter Saunders 7/20/12 – Physician Assisted Suicide (7/22/12)

National Right to Life News Today – EU court refuses to impose euthanasia by Paul Russell (7/23/12)

Policymic – Assisted suicide debate: Canada raises controversy after striking down ban by Lowell McDonald (7/25/12)

Not Dead Yet – Assisted suicide laws violate the ADA by Diane Coleman (7/25/12)

The Daily Caller – Death Panels on Steroids by Rita L. Marker & Wesley J. Smith of The Patients Rights Council (7/25/12)

The Tea Party Economist – Assisted Dying: The Death Panels Are Coming  by Gary North (7/26/12)

Secondhand Smoke – The Dutch Cook the Euthanasia Books by Wesley J. Smith (7/26/12) – Euthanasia backers now want assisted suicide without doctors by Wesley J.Smith (7/26/12)

Fr. Z’s Blog – Obamacare = Euthanasia (7/27/12)

White Coat Notes – Dr. Barbara Rockett: Physician-assisted suicide ‘in direct conflict’ with doctor’s role (7/31/12)

White Coat Notes – Dr. Marcia Angell: Ballot question to allow physician aid in dying respects patient wishes (7/31/12)

Sociology Lens – Physician-assisted suicide: A topic of growing importance by Candace Smith (7/31/12)

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition – Assisted Suicide: U.S. Overview by Margaret Dore (7/31/12)


Reasons Why physicians do not have discussion about poor prognosis, why it matters, and what can be improved by Jennifer W. Mack and Thomas J. Smith in Journal of Clinical Oncology (7/2/12)

Redefining Physician’s Role in Assisted Dying by Julian J.Z. Prokopetz, BA and Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, MD, PhD in The New England Journal of Medicine (7/18/12)


Euthanasia Debate  (6/30/12)
‘Canadians must act NOW against assisted suicide,’ says anti-euthanasia leader by Jean McCarthy – 7/3/12
Debating Euthanasia – Jennifer Tyron with panel 7/5/12 – Follow up to: Taking Mercy (3/21/12)
Aja Riggs, cancer patient, joins aid in dying lawsuit (New Mexico) (7/9/12)
Euthanasia debate with Philip Nitschke and Bernadette Tobin (7/20/12)
Sir Terry Pratchett on assisted dying (7/26/12)


Interview with Dr. Lisa Lehmann on the physician’s role in assisted dying for terminally ill patients (Director of the Center for Bioethics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital) – (7/12/12)

AARP senior end of life decisions by John Wright (7/20/12)

The Jefferson Exchange – Compassion & Choices: Oregon’s assisted-suicide law presents a number of hurdles for terminal patients to overcome to end their own lives. The group Compassion & Choices of Oregon works with the patients to overcome the hurdles.  Compassion & Choices provides access to a network of volunteers and professionals with experience in implementing Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act.  (7/30/12)


Central mechanism would remove physician from assisted-dying process by Sarah Guy( 7/24/12) – The development of a central state or federal mechanism in the USA that would confirm the authenticity and eligibility of terminally ill patients’ requests for death, dispense medication, and monitor demand and use, could remove physicians from the assisted dying process, say researchers.

Canadians and Britons would allow euthanasia under some conditions – Respondents in US are more likely to question whether doctor-assisted suicide should be permitted at all – Polls by country

Choice is an Illusion: A website opposing assisted suicide and euthanasia – many states

(News this month from California, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Wisconsin)


Assisted suicide: compassion or crime? by Kate McGinty, (7/29/12)


By whatever name, dignity by Lewis Cohen, MD, (7/6/12)
Distilled to its essence, the ballot asks: Should dying people have the right to physician-assisted suicide?

In Massachusetts, during the months leading up to Election Day, the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, pro-life groups, conservative politicians and segments of the disability community will unite to wage a fierce campaign.

Be prepared to hear from other opposition spokespersons that the law will target society’s most vulnerable populations. Get ready for fear-mongering to rival the rhetoric many of these same individuals have previously offered in their opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion and the right to choose birth control. We are going to hear claims that death with dignity sanctions elder abuse.

Do not expect the opposition’s leaders to cite the annual statistical report which the Oregon Health Authority publishes online. The 2011 data challenge all of these theoretical worries and concerns.

There is no factual basis for most of the arguments that will be offered, but they will make for thrilling election year drama.


Death with Dignoty Act on November Ballot – abc40news, Springfield MA  (7/11/12) – w/video – Dr. Lewis Cohen, a local psychiatrist and professor at Tufts University School of Medicine, is one of the founding members of the petition.

The Death With Dignity Act is one of three initiatives that will be on the November ballot. If passed by voters the law would allow terminally ill patients to end their own life. “There are few people who we really can’t help with their suffering,” said Dr. Lewis Cohen.
“I can tell you as a psychiatrist a big piece of it is that people have to have the capacity to make this decision and they have to demonstrate it,” said Dr. Cohen.

Beware slippery slope of ‘doctor-prescribed suicide’ – Letter to The Herald News (7/15/12) – One of the questions on the ballot in November will be legalization of assisted suicide, a.k.a Death With Dignity, or more accurately known as doctor-prescribed suicide.
There is no dignity in suicide. It is a terrible tragedy. If this initiative passes, it will shift our approach toward the sick and dying in this state from one of compassion and care to one of encouraging self-destruction. Doctor-prescribed suicide is medical abandonment.  A doctor will not have to be present when the patient takes the lethal drugs.
The Massachusetts Medical Society voted last December to reaffirm its opposition to physician-assisted suicide.
Life is the most basic gift from God, a gift which is entrusted to our care, not that we have control over it.
The Evolving state of physician-assisted suicide by Jaime Joyce, theAtlantic, 7/16/12 – Should terminally ill patients have the right to kill themselves? Voters in Massachusetts will soon decide. Last Wednesday, the Secretary of the Commonwealth announced that on November 6, 2012, when Bay State voters go to the polls to pick the next President, they will also have their say on a ballot measure called the Death with Dignity Act. If passed, the law would make Massachusetts the third state to give adults diagnosed with six months or less to live the option to end their lives using a lethal dose of doctor-prescribed medication.

A study released by the Health Research and Education Trust shows that Americans are living longer lives than ever before. As a result, more individuals and families will face difficult questions about end-of-life care. In 2011, the oldest Baby Boomers turned 65. By 2030, the number of Boomers between 66 and 84 years old will climb to 61 million, and six out of 10 will be managing chronic health conditions. For the elderly and others facing terminal illness, doctors have numerous ways to prolong life. Palliative and hospice care are available to help patients find peace and comfort in their final days. But there are some people who want another option, which is the right to end suffering by taking their own life at a time and place of their choosing.

Push for “death with dignity” in Massachusetts picks up steam by Kevin B. O’Reilly, (7/16/12) – Early polling results: Sixty percent of Massachusetts voters support “allowing people who are dying to legally obtain medication that they could use to end their lives,” according to a Western New England University Polling Institute survey of 504 voters conducted at the end of May. Twenty-nine percent said they opposed the idea, and 11% declined to answer the question.

“This statute has worked as intended in both Oregon and Washington,” Crawford said. “The scare tactics the opposition uses simply haven’t come to life.”

Assisted suicide backers confident they’ll win in Massachusettes – 7/27/12) – Massachusetts is the latest battleground over euthanasia with an initiative on the ballot in November to adopt a statute similar to those in Oregon and Washington, which allow physicians to prescribe suicide for their patients. As in Oregon and Washington, the Massachusetts proposal states assisted suicide would be legal for residents of the state in cases where a doctor has determined the patient has less than six months to live. However, the examples of the two Western states have shown that those safeguards do not work.


“Does the Board really want to put itself in the embarrassing position of overstepping its authority by condoning this procedure?” Montanans against assisted suicide and for living with dignity (7/18/12) – I am having trouble understanding why our Montana Board of Medical Examiners would step out on a limb and seemingly promote, or at least encourage physicians to go along with a procedure, Physician Assisted Suicide for the following reasons:


Racial differences in end-of-life planning: Why don’t blacks and Latinos prepare for the inevitable?– Rutgers (7/20/12) – Both religious beliefs and cultural attitudes toward receiving support from family members accounted for the gap between white subjects and minorities, said Carr.
Older blacks are more likely to believe that God controls the time and circumstance of someone’s death and that it’s inappropriate to interfere.
“Their thinking is, ‘this is not our decision to mess around with,” Carr said.
For Latinos, the starkest contrast involved entrusting one particular family member with durable power of attorney. Only four percent of Latinos chose a relative to voice decisions for the incapacitated patient. The likely explanation is that if you grew up in a culture that’s close-knit, you make decisions as a family unit, you’re not going to choose one person,’’ she said.
In both black and Latino families, she said, there is evidence that people are more likely to view caring for ill or aging members as the norm, whereas white subjects had a greater fear of “burdening’’ family with their illness.
Because blacks especially have higher rates of illness, shorter life spans and less access to preventive care, it’s especially important for them to discuss what kind of treatment they would want in the event of a terminal illness and what family members’ roles would be, Carr said.

New Jersey Euthanasia Laws


Doctors, patient challenge New Mexico assisted suicide ban by Diane Carman, (7/11/120 – The question before the court in New Mexico is absurdly simple and yet impossibly complex. What is the meaning of “assisting suicide”?
If a terminally-ill patient refuses a ventilator or a feeding tube and the physician yields to that decision, is that assisting suicide? If the patient is in excruciating pain and requests total sedation and no nutrition or fluids, can the doctor be held accountable for his death? What if the patient seeks a prescription from her physician so that when the pain of dying is overwhelming she can seek the ultimate relief on her own?

Death with Dignity? More like war on New Mexico’s elderly! by Anna Maria Hoffman (7/16/12) – Currently, Doctors Aroop Mangalik and Katherine Morris, along with cancer patient Aja Riggs, are challenging New Mexico’s pro-life ban on assisted suicide in court. They ultimately want to prove that their loophole “aid in dying” argument—giving conscious terminally ill patients lethal medicine to die—is not assisted suicide. In their view, New Mexico’s assisted suicide ban does not take advanced terminal illness treatment into account and does not bar physicians from practicing “aid in dying” procedures. Looks like these plaintiffs are circumventing the state’s law to impose their pro-death will through court.

NDY quoted in article on New Mexico assisted suicide case by Diane Coleman of Not Dead Yet (7/17/12) – Throughout the 1980’s and across the country, courts repeatedly and unequivocally answered “no” (i.e. no problem) to the first two questions, but Compassion and Choices (C&C) often raises the specter of being hooked to unwanted tubes and forced to endure unwanted medical treatments when advocating for something completely different than the well established right to refuse treatment.  Despite nearly 25 years of widespread public education about using advance directives to refuse unwanted treatment, C&C counts on people to forget these facts and conflate the issues.  C&C is pushing for the term “aid in dying” to include not only refusing treatment, palliative care, and hospice, but also assisted suicide, rolling it all into one focus group tested phrase.


Assisted Dying: Experts Debate Doctor’s Roleby Katie Moisse, 7/13/12) – Peggy Sutherland was ready to die. The morphine oozing from a pump in her spine was no match for the pain of lung cancer, which had evaded treatment and invaded her ribs.

“She needed so much morphine it would have rendered her basically unconscious,” said Sutherland’s daughter, Julie McMurchie, who lives in Portland, Ore. “She was just kind of done.”

Sutherland, 68, decided to use Oregon’s “Death With Dignity Act,” which allows terminally-ill residents to end their lives after a 15-day requisite waiting period by self-administering a lethal prescription drug.

“Her doctor wrote the prescription and met my husband and me at the pharmacy on the 15th day,” said McMurchie, recalling how her mother “didn’t want to wait,” she said. “Then he came back to the house, and he stayed with us until her heart stopped beating.”

But not all doctors are on board with the law. In the 15 years since Oregon legalized physician-assisted dying, only Washington and Montana have followed suit, a resistance some experts blame on the medical community.


Rhode Island Euthanasia Laws


Houston man charged in wife’s assisted suicide by Philip Caulfield – NY Daily News (7/3/12) – Her husband, Mark Kelly, 47, reported his wife’s death, and admitted to police that he helped her kill herself because the couple was having financial problems.

Kelly was charged with aiding suicide, a state jail felony. He was being held on $2,000 bail and could get up to two years in prison if convicted.


Bishops urge against use of Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (7/25/12) – The Roman Catholic bishops of Wisconsin recently expressed concern for “Upholding the Dignity of Human Life” in a statement warning against the use of Physician (or Provider) Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST).

Wisconsin Bishops warn against POLST end of care document by Jean McCarthy – (7/26/12) –
In a statement issued yesterday, the Roman Catholic bishops of Wisconsin are warning against the end of life care document called Physician (or Provider) Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST).  The bishops are concerned that use of this document could lead to acts of euthanasia.


(News this month from Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, The Netherlands, New Zealand, South Africa, Switzerland, Trinidad, United Kingdom)


Euthanasia debate heating up in Tasmania by Alex Schadenberg, LifeSiteNews 7/2/12 – The euthanasia issue is heating up in Tasmania. The Tasmanian Parliament has debated euthanasia on several occasions and over the years it has had two inquiries into the feasibility of legalizing euthanasia with both enquiries deciding against legalization.

While in Tasmania, the big issue that the people shared with me was the crisis in healthcare that was occurring on the Island.

The Tasmanian people were very concerned that the Greens and Labor leaders are pushing euthanasia again to achieve cost savings in healthcare. Whether this is true or not, it should be noted that when the pressure to cut the cost of healthcare is mixed with euthanasia, that the pressure to die will soon outweigh the will to live.

Opposition to relentless push for euthanasia legalization in Australia by Jason Rushton, (7/3/12) – More than 19 bills to legalise euthanasia have been introduced into Australian parliaments since 2002.

In the current South Australian parliament, a voluntary euthanasia bill has been introduced on five separate occasions, the latest one being defeated 22-20 as recently as June 15 of this year.

Q&A with Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, and Labour MP Maryan Street (7/1/12)
Nitschke to establish euthanasia clinic in Tasmania, if euthanasia becomes legal by Alex Schadenberg, executive director Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, National Right to Life News Today (7/4/12) – Today I had the opportunity to speak to members of the Tasmanian parliament about why it is not safe to legalize euthanasia or assisted suicide. In response to a question from a member of the Tasmanian parliament, I reminded them that Philip Nitschke had already promised to establish a euthanasia clinic in Tasmania, if they legalize euthanasia.

Is it possible to have safe, legal and rare euthanasia?  by Dr. Pravin Thevathasan, National Right to Life News Today (7/4/12) – A recent press release from the British Medical Journal states: “The BMJ supports a call from leading UK medical bodies to stop opposing assisted dying for terminally ill, mentally competent adults. Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD) wants the British Medical Association and royal colleges to move their position from opposition to neutrality.”
It was an extraordinary failure of judgement on the part of what is probably the world’s most prestigious medical journal.

Spreading the anti-euthanasia message down under by Alex Schadenberg, 7/6/12 – There were more than 400 people who came to the Life Dinner to hear my talk in Melbourne.

Attending the Life Dinner were several political leaders including The Hon Kevin Andrews MP (Liberal) who in 1996, steered through the federal parliament the legislation that overturned the Northern Territories euthanasia legislation.

Hon. Kevin Andrews informed me that politics is not only the art of the possible, but a good plan creates possibilities and can be implemented. The Andrews bill accomplished what was first perceived to be impossible.


Is euthanasia legalized murder? Dutch doctors have gone from fighting death to administering it by Anne McTavish, (7/3/12) – Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) is a hard case, and it’s bad law. It’s about people with serious, debilitating, terminal illnesses who want doctors to kill them. It’s not just that they want to die, it’s that they want to die later and to have someone else do it in a way that won’t hurt.

The plaintiffs and Madam Justice Smith focused on the seriously ill people and their situation. I want to focus on the doctors and the rest of us who will be harmed if this decision becomes law.

Let terminally ill choose: One writer’s eloquence changed my mind about assisted suicide by Naomi Lakritz in The Edmunton Journal (7/3/12) – … that’s not what this is about. We’re not talking about fomenting a Jack Kevorkianlike ghoulishness among physicians. This is not about doctors rushing in with blood lust in their eyes, ready to knock off any patient who gives them the nod – or even a patient who doesn’t. It’s not about doctors making decisions for patients; it’s about patients making decisions for themselves.

Choosing Death: We have to talk about it in, editorial (7/3/12) – Canada is inching closer and closer to a national discussion about assisted suicide. And it’s about time.
In its most recent edition, the Canadian Medical Association Journal is calling for a Canada-wide debate. Circumstances are pushing the nation in that direction: In Quebec, the Dying with Dignity Commission (an all-party group drawn from the National Assembly) recently issued a comprehensive report suggesting, in part, that doctors who help a terminally ill patient die by suicide not be charged criminally. And a judge in the British Columbia Supreme Court in June struck down laws banning doctor-assisted suicide as unconstitutional, ruling on the case of a B.C. woman who has Lou Gehrig’s Disease.
…the very central question is clear: When a person is dying, when their quality of life has deteriorated to the extent that they don’t wish to continue, ought there be some avenue that is not illegal? We don’t need to reinvent the wheel, since other countries including Switzerland, the Netherlands and Belgium have euthanasia social policy.

Where’s our right to die? by Santiago Wills, Salon (7/3/12) – …according to Howard Ball, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Vermont, the legalization of physician-assisted death is a gesture of human compassion. As he details in his new book, “At Liberty to Die: The Battle for Death With Dignity in America,” the issue goes to the heart of bigger questions about the American soul — from the meaning of personal liberty to the importance of constitutional law.

Another View: Let’s talk about assisted suicide in (7/4/12) – In its most recent edition, the Canadian Medical Association Journal is calling for a Canada-wide debate. Circumstances are pushing the nation in that direction: In Quebec, the Dying with Dignity Commission (an all-party group drawn from the National Assembly) recently issued a comprehensive report suggesting, in part, that doctors who help a terminally ill patient die by suicide not be charged criminally. And a judge in the British Columbia Supreme Court in June struck down laws banning doctor-assisted suicide as unconstitutional, ruling on the case of a B.C. woman who has Lou Gehrig’s Disease.

The CMAJ editorial, provocatively headlined “Are we ready to perform therapeutic homicide?” makes the point that this is not a debate for courtrooms, lawyers and judges, but rather for average Canadians and their elected proxies in Parliament.

There’s the rub. The Harper government does not want this debate.

Now’s the time to stand against euthanasia urges Canadian bishops’ group by Patrick B. Craine, (7/9/12) – “It is time to stand up and speak!” insists the Catholic Organization for Life and Family (COLF).

In a new reflection, the organization, which was co-founded by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Knights of Columbus, is calling on Catholics and people of good will to engage the debate on end-of-life issues. The plea comes in the wake of a British Columbia judge’s ruling that legalizes euthanasia and assisted suicide and the recent Quebec government report calling for “medical assistance in dying.”

How about the right to cry for help? court ruling asserting a person’s right to assisted suicide reflects discriminatory attitudes toward the disabled – by Amy E. Hasbrouck, chair of Not Dead Yet, an international organization of people with disabilities who oppose the legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide in The Gazette (7/9/12) – The long and the short of the reasons for judgment issued by Justice Lynn Smith is that legal provisions in Canada prohibiting assisted suicide law are unconstitutional because they impede disabled people’s rights to life, liberty and security of the person.

The judge believes that having a disability or degenerative illness is a rational reason to want to die, and that those of us with disabilities should be helped to die if we can’t do it neatly or efficiently ourselves.

The B.C. Supreme Court has chosen not to listen very closely to disability-rights advocates with more than 20 years of experience battling discrimination; instead, the court relied on the stories of people who have accepted the view that disability is undignified, and that people with disabilities should be given a streamlined path to death whenever they want it and however they want it.

Justice Smith assumes that, because it’s no longer illegal, suicide is somehow an affirmative right; and if you can’t do it the way you want to do it, then you should have the right to have someone do it for you.

Churchgoers more likely to support euthanasia: Survey (7/10/12) – A new survey has found Protestant churchgoers are more likely to support doctor-assisted suicide in controlled situations than Canadians at large.
Assisted-suicide ruling to be appealed by Ottawa – Civil-liberties lawyer calls move ‘perplexing’ in case of terminally ill B.C. woman- CBC News (7/13/12) – The federal government will appeal last month’s ruling by the British Columbia Supreme Court that partially struck down Canada’s ban on assisted suicide, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says.
The ruling declared that the Criminal Code section targeting anyone who “aids or abets a person to commit suicide” should not apply to physicians in cases where terminally ill patients request to die.

Judge Lynn Smith halted her decision for a year to give Parliament a chance to rewrite the law, which she deemed unconstitutional because it unfairly deprives people with degenerative illnesses of their liberty, and because it discriminates against those with a physical disability who might need assistance to exercise their right to take their own life.

But she also granted an immediate exemption for Gloria Taylor, one of the women who brought the suit, and her doctor.

Update: Government of Canada Condemns Gloria Taylor to a Slow Death by Cathryn Wellner (7/13/12) – On Friday the 13th, the Conservative government of Canada dealt Gloria Taylor a cruel blow. Justice Minister Rob Nicholson announced his government will appeal the ruling that would have allowed her to die with dignity.
A month earlier the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted the 64-year-old woman, who suffers from ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or Lou Gehrig’s disease), the right to request the assistance of her doctor if she wished to end her life.

Conservative Government to appeal assisted suicide ruling after B.C.Supreme Court strikes down ban – National Post (7/13/12) – The landmark ruling last month said the ban is unconstitutional and gave Ottawa a year to rewrite it. Judge Lynn Smith also granted an immediate exemption to the law, allowing Gloria Taylor, one of the women who brought the lawsuit, to die with a doctor’s help.

In a statement, Nicholson said the government intends to seek a stay on all aspects of the ruling, including the exemption for Taylor, while it goes to the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

It’s time for a national debate on assisted suicide– The Gazette (7/16/12) – Call it what you will – assisted suicide, euthanasia or therapeutic homicide – it is an issue that politicians are reluctant to engage, but one which is not going away.

Last month, a British Columbia Supreme Court judge ruled that Canada’s ban on assisted suicide is unconstitutional on grounds that it violates two sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms concerning the right to equality, and the right to life, liberty and security of the person.

The ruling did not strike down the law, but rather ordered the federal government to amend the provisions of the Criminal Code that currently make it an offence to counsel or assist someone to commit suicide. It did, however, extend an exemption for a plaintiff in the case, a 64-year-old B.C. woman suffering from Lou Gehrig’s disease (or ALS) to die with a doctor’s assistance.

Who decides how we die? – Edmunton Journal (7/16/12) – Why has Justice Minister Rob Nicholson appealed the B.C. ruling that struck down the law that makes physician-assisted death illegal in Canada? By refusing to allow Gloria Taylor, who is dying from Lou Gehrig’s disease, the right to a doctor-assisted death, Nicholson is committing her to a painful death. That is not justice. It’s unnecessary cruelty.
Nicholson states the laws surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide exist to protect all Canadians, including the most vulnerable such as the sick, the elderly and people with disabilities. B.C. Supreme Court Justice Lynn Smith agreed, but after sifting through mountains of evidence concluded that in countries allowing medically assisted dying, there is no threat to these groups. Nicholson is ignoring this evidence.

Assisted-suicide slope not so slipperyby Arthur Schafer, (7/19/12) – Gloria Taylor, a British Columbia ALS patient, insists it should be up to her to decide when the prospect of continued life is worse than the prospect of hastened death. Once she reaches that point, however, she may no longer be physically able to end her own life. So, she claims, it is her right to seek assistance in dying from a willing physician.

“What I want is to be able to die in a manner that is consistent with the way that I lived my life. I want to be able to exercise control and die with dignity and with my sense of self and personal integrity intact,” she has explained. “I want to be able to experience my death as part of my life and part of my expression of that life. I do not want the manner of my death to undermine the values that I lived my life in accordance with…”

A great majority of Canadians supports Taylor’s position. Similar support existed 19 years ago for Sue Rodriguez, another ALS patient who took her case all the way to the Supreme Court. Rodriguez lost, but only very narrowly, by a five-to-four vote.

Despite strong public support for decriminalization of physician-assisted suicide, it remains illegal in Canada. Attempting suicide ceased to be a crime in 1974; but aiding someone to commit suicide remains an offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The voluntary request of the patient — even when she is a competent adult, rational and fully informed — is no defence.

In a dramatic decision, however, the British Columbia Supreme Court has ruled it is Taylor’s constitutional right to decide for herself whether she wants a physician to assist her to die. The federal government is appealing this decision. Ultimately, the Supreme Court of Canada will have to rule.

It’s expensive to support the disabled– suicide kits are $39.95by Rhonda Wiebe (7/21/12) – Arthur Schafer’s portrayal of comments on the merits of physician-assisted suicide need challenging (Assisted-suicide slope not so slippery, July 19). Schafer, like many supporters of physician-assisted suicide (also known as “doctor-prescribed death”), does not seem to have considered the wider issues facing Canadians with disabilities, including the ongoing social prejudice and discouraging lack of living supports that we encounter on a daily basis.

The recent decision in the British Columbia Supreme Court regarding the constitutional right of Gloria Taylor, an ALS patient, to end her own life rather than live with disability only confirms what we with disabilities already know — that many Canadians believe it is better to be dead than disabled. What also became clear in the decision is that the judge believes it is better to be dead than disabled. The judgment was pronounced without considering the message it sends to all of us who believe that despite profound functional limitations, we want to live.

Our right to die – (7/20/12) – Last week the Canadian government announced plans to appeal a British Columbia court decision allowing doctor assisted suicide.
Last month, the British Columbia Supreme Court struck down a ban on doctor assisted suicide, but granted a one-year stay to give Parliament time to rewrite the law. There was an exception to the stay, though, that allowed applicant Gloria Taylor, who has ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease, to end her life when she sees fit with the help of a doctor.
The government’s decision to appeal the ruling is questionable.
Anyone at death’s door should have a right to die when and how they see fit. According to Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights : “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
Not everyone agrees with interpretations of the section that it includes allowing a terminally ill person to die with medical help, but it’s a worthwhile interpretation.
A person of sound mind, who is suffering from an ever-worsening debilitating condition should have the option of choosing a humane death, not constant pain with no quality of life. That’s not living.

Medical Nightmare: Doctors won’t let wife act on behalf of ailing husband by Peter Baklinski  – (7/20/12) – An Ontario woman is crying foul after a team of doctors effectively denied the woman her legal right to act on behalf of her husband who was hospitalized after a stroke. The woman is fighting to regain control of her husband’s medical treatment.

Marilyn met with her husband’s team of doctors who not only refused to change his drug regimen, but threatened that if she did not comply with the drug plan, she would loose her legal power of attorney over her husband.

“Not only did the meds not get changed, but I was threatened over and over,” she said.

One doctor allegedly told Marilyn: “One of us has to go, and it’s going to be you.”

“I was just telling them the truth as I knew it, hoping that they would change the meds, but it didn’t happen that way,” she said. “They have never honored my legal power of attorney.”

She alleges that doctors were responsible for bringing her before the Consent and Capacity Board so that she could be deemed “incapacitated” to represent her husband.

“They’ve put him on palliative care against the wishes of the family,” she said, adding that he is not receiving adequate hydration.

Not only this, but Marilyn says that she was barred from visiting her husband in December, but has since regained permission to visit under supervision.

“Putting this in perspective, if doctors are already imposing decision on patients as ‘medical treatment,’ how long does it take before they start imposing euthanasia and assisted suicide on patients as a form of ‘medical treatment’?” Alex Schadenberg, director of Canada’s Euthanasia Prevention Coalition asked.

Schadenberg pointed out that many doctors would not proscribe such treatment, but added that “there will always be some who will abuse the power that they have been given to take lives.”

Ask the religion experts: Does the renewed debate on doctor assisted suicide say anything about the sanctity of life in modern times? – The Ottawa Citizen (7/21/12) – Cases in which there may or may not be doctor-assisted suicide are anything but abstract. This means discussions about this matter need to be undertaken within the wider context of the Canadian health-care system. For that matter, it cannot be addressed through law or medicine alone. We need broad reflection on the experience of death and dying.
Requests for doctor-assisted suicide appear to be signs of the failure of human community. It is difficult, if not impossible, to regard life as sacred if we have no assurance that we will be supported in all circumstances. We need to be certain that we will not be forced to endure dehumanizing medical procedures. We need confidence that we will not be abandoned in our suffering. With all the financial strains that our health-care system is facing, terminally ill people need to know that assisted suicide is not being promoted because it is actually cheaper than good palliative care.

Dying in Court by Peter Singer – (7/21/12) – A Canadian’s fight for the right to die could provide an international precedent in the case for assisted suicide.

Appeal is cruel by John Warren – Calgary Herald (7/21/12) – By refusing to allow Gloria Taylor, who is dying from Lou Gehrig’s disease, the right to a doctor-assisted death, he is committing her to a painful death.
That is not justice. It’s unnecessary cruelty.

Medically assisted suicide: Compassionate or criminal?– The Vancouver Sun (7/23/12) – Striking down laws against assisted suicide and euthanasia puts lives at risk and is likely to lead to the untimely deaths of vulnerable people whether they choose it or not.

Those who insist it should be legal out of respect for personal autonomy, so individuals have the free choice, don’t realize that legalizing it may have the opposite effect.

Depression, not pain, main reason patients request euthanasia by Anne McTavish – Troy Media (7/24/12) – Yet again, our courts have been asked to change the law and allow doctors to actively end a person’s life (euthanasia) or to provide a patient with the drugs to kill themself (physician-assisted suicide, or PAS).

BMA doctors argue assisted suicide is ‘never justified’ as they vote against euthanasiaby Claire Bates, Anglican Mainstream (7/28/12) – Doctors have reiterated their opposition to assisted dying at the British Medical Association’s conference today.

Campaigners wanted delegates to agree to take a neutral stance on the issue, but members of the BMA voted against this proposal. One delegate argued that killing patients was ‘never justified’ likening it to murder.

The Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD) had called for the BMA to move its position from opposition to ‘studied’ neutrality.


10-year old American boy receives euthanasia – (7/23/12) – photo journey of the family with a 10-year old American boy diagnosed with neuroblastoma who goes through two years of treatments then chooses euthanasia to make his transition


President launches euthanasia debate – The Connexion (7/18/12) – PRESIDENT Hollande has reignited debate on euthanasia, saying he wants to “go further” than the existing “Leonetti Law” on the end of life, which rules it out. Visiting a hospice in the Hauts-de-Seine, the president said he wants to put in place a reform of care for the terminally ill in the “coming months,” possibly allowing for a form of assisted dying.
He has charged the president of a national medical ethics committee, Prof Didier Sicard, with running consultations around the country to feed into reforms.
However euthanasia pressure group the Association Pour le Droit de Mourir dans la Dignité, says the professor has a Catholic bias to his views.


Assisted Suicide: Germany loses Strasbourg case – BBC News Europe (7/19/12) – After suffering a bad fall in 2002 Mr Koch’s wife needed artificial ventilation and constant nursing care. She wanted to end her life, but Germany’s Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices refused to let her do so with sodium pentobarbital.
Mr Koch’s challenges on her behalf got nowhere in Germany as the courts cited the existing ban on active assisted suicide.
The Dignitas facility in Switzerland later enabled Mrs Koch to die.

European court rules on euthanasia debate – Deutsche Welle (7/19/12) – The European Court of Human Rights issued a decision Thursday on whether states may refuse to assist in a suicide. Germany’s laws on assisted suicide draw a fine line between what’s permitted, and what’s not. Questions remain.

Strasbourg hits euthanasia ball back into German courts – Deutsche Welle (7/19/12) – The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that it’s up to individual countries to decide on euthanasia. It also decided, however, that the German courts should not have thrown out a widower’s appeals.


Government not in favor of euthanasia– The Times of India (7/28/12) – The minister said the law of the land prohibited active euthanasia and the Supreme Court had laid out guidelines for passive euthanasia. “In this situation, there’s no need for us to recommend anything. We feel our effort should be to help a person live, whatever be the situation. It’s about compassion and service.”

However, members were divided over the issue. Referring to the case of HD Karibasamma, a teacher in Davanagere who is seeking euthanasia due to health problems, Shivayogi Swamy said: “It’s torture for the patient and family members. It’s like death every minute. Moreover, such cases have financial implications. Several countries have legalized euthanasia. We should pass a resolution and send it to the Centre.”


Thousands in Netherlands die without consent since euthanasia OK by Steven Ertelt,  (7/4/12) – Alex Schadenberg, the executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, has a message for Canadians: contact federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson now, and urge him to appeal the recent decision by Justice Lynn Smith in British Columbia striking down Canada’s laws on assisted suicide. (video)

Legalising assisted dying ‘doesn’t lead to more opting death’by Stephen Adams, The Telegraph (7/11/12) –

The study, published in The Lancet, found rates before and after legalisation in 2002 were comparable.

The figures have been leapt upon by advocates of a change in the law here, who say they show there would be no “slippery slope” towards more people choosing assisted dying.

But opponents warn it shows there has been a big rise in the use of methods that border on assisted dying, such as continuous deep sedation.

In 2002 The Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalise assisted dying, although it had been tolerated since the 1970s. The rules only cover patients with an incurable condition who face unbearable suffering.

The Dutch academics found that between 1990 and 2001 the rate of euthanasia and assisted suicide cases rose from 1.9 to 2.8 per cent of all deaths.

Dutch euthanasia figures present muddled picture by Michael Cook, BioEdge (7/14/12) – It is true that there is a “V” shaped curve in the number of cases of voluntary euthanasia. In 2001, before legalisation, about 2.6% of all deaths were due to voluntary euthanasia. In 2005, this dropped to 1.7%, and rose in 2010 back up to 2.8%.
But what accounts for the drop? It was not lack of interest. The proportion of patients requesting euthanasia rose from 4.8% of all patient deaths in 2005 to 6.7% in 2010. And doctors were also more willing to grant it. In 2005, 37% of these requests were granted and in 2010 45%.

Doubts emerge about Dutch guidelines for terminal sedation by Michael Cook (7/20/12) – Should deep, continuous sedation at the end of life really be treated as normal medical practice in the Netherlands, ask three Dutch authors in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Although they do not appear to oppose euthanasia, they argue that “morally problematic aspects inherent to palliative sedation do not get the attention they deserve” under current guidelines. Since palliative sedation accounted for more than 12% of deaths in the Netherlands in 2010, this is an important issue.

Although euthanasia – which ends a patient’s life immediately – is the most visible and controversial aspect of end-of-life care for international observers, the innocuous-sounding treatment called “palliative sedation” (also called “terminal sedation” by some authors) also has been the centre of controversy in the Netherlands. In 2003, the then-attorney-general argued that the death of a deeply sedated patient because water was withheld was culpable homicide. However, his view did not prevail.

The Lancet proves euthanasia deaths are rising in The Netherlands by Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (7/17/12) – The long awaited 2010 nationwide examination of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands was published in The Lancet on July 11, 2012. The study found that:

* the number of euthanasia deaths has grown significantly since 2005 (4050 in 2010, 2425 in 2005)

* the under-reporting of euthanasia in the Netherlands has grown since 2005 (23% in 2010, 20% in 2005)

* there is a growth in deaths by terminal sedation (12.3% in 2010, 8.2% in 2005)

* the percentage of requests for euthanasia being fulfilled has increased (45% in 2010, 37% in 2005)

* the number of deaths without request or consent has decreased (300 in 2010, 550 in 2005)

The media decided to ignore the significant growth in the number of euthanasia deaths since 2005, by reporting that the current percentage of euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands is similar to the percentage of euthanasia deaths in 2001, before it was officially legalized.


Panel discusses the euthanasia debate in New Zealand – TVNZ (7/1/12) -interview with Auckland Chamber of Commerce Chief Executive, Massey University Vice-Chancellor, Political Scientist and a cancer patient

Will assisted death be made legal by Noel Cheer, BusinessScoop (7/9/12) – Will Assisted Death be made legal? With Maryan Street’s Private Member’s Bill waiting to be balloted, the “voluntary euthanasia” debate has effectively been re-opened. The insistence that “I own my body” has lead to the claim that …Will Assisted Death be made legal?

With Maryan Street’s Private Member’s Bill waiting to be balloted, the “voluntary euthanasia” debate has effectively been re-opened.

Euthanasia may again test our politiciansby Katie Bradford-Crozier – (7/24/12) – The controversial topic of euthanasia could once again be about to test our politicians.

Labour’s Maryan Street is submitting a Bill to the Members’ ballot that would see euthanasia decriminalised.

There’d be strict conditions, such as two separate medical practitioners having to deem the person concerned is of sound mind, has a terminal illness and hasn’t been coerced in any way.

Ms Street is hoping recent high profile cases will make MPs realise the time is right to take another look at the issue.

Euthanasis law would ‘force doctors to lie’by Natasha Burling – (7/27/12) –

A doctor who cares for dying people says the introduction of a law legalising euthanasia would force doctors to lie.

A Bill decriminalising the practice has been put in the member’s ballot by Labour MP Maryan Street.

Capital and Coast palliative medicine consultant Dr Sinead Donnelly says if it was passed, it would be a disaster for society.

She says under the Bill, doctors would have to say the person’s underlying illness was the cause of death, not the lethal injection.

“And in this legislation they want the doctor to lie, to tell a lie, in addition to killing the patient, or to giving the patient, the person, the injection that killed them.”

Dr Donnelly says the legislation is incredibly poor and is shocked by it.

Man pleads guilty to assisting suicide by Anna Cross (5/4/12) – Lesley Martin helped her ill mother die and says people are determined to have a peaceful and dignified death, so they take matters into their own hands.
She says it happens far more than what’s reported.”There is a well established euthanasia underground accessed in any country where legislation isn’t in place for people to access medically assisted dying openly and honestly.”

Euthanasia backers cite fear of burdening others by Bronwyn Torrie (7/27/12) – Healthy pro-euthanasia pensioners would rather cut their lives short than be a financial drain on society, a study shows.
Auckland University researchers interviewed 11 healthy men and women aged between 69 and 89 on why they supported voluntary euthanasia.

Reasons included not wanting to be a burden on their families and healthcare resources and fears of losing their independence and dignity.

“If you couldn’t do your basic care, couldn’t wash yourself or go to the loo by yourself, I don’t want to go on after that,” an 86-year-old woman said.

“And I don’t expect [my husband] wants me to go on like that either, or my family.”

Being remembered in “a good way”, not as a shadow of their former selves, was also important. Many had watched a loved one die and did not want to be in a position where they could not make decisions for themselves.


Death is inevitable, pain is optional by Thalia Randall – Mail&Guardian (7/6/12) – Some believe that proper palliative care goes a long way towards countering arguments for euthanasia.

South Africa Doctors ‘Secretly Help People Die’– (7/12/12) – South Africa should legalise euthanasia as many doctors are already secretly helping elderly patients to die, Western Cape University Prof Sean Davison said on Thursday.

“Many doctors have said to me privately that they’ve helped people to die… at their request. It’s the choice of the doctor [though]… and they have to do it behind the scenes illegally,” he said.

With no choice whether to die or not, critically ill patients had to rely on the graciousness of their doctor.

“If you don’t have a law change, you might be playing Lotto with your doctor.”


Canton votes for assisted suicide– (6/29/12) – Churches in the Swiss canton of Vaud have condemned a move that will permit assisted suicide in nursing homes and hospitals in the canton.

On 17 June, almost two-thirds of voters (62 per cent) in the canton voted in a legally binding referendum in favour of a proposal that would oblige nursing homes and hospitals to allow assisted suicide, provided the person who wishes it is suffering from an incurable illness or injury and is of sound mind.

Local Bishop Charles Morerod of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg, said the consequences of the decision were “terrible”.

Finding a place for assisted suicide in society by Clare O’Dea, (7/9/12) – The two main Swiss assisted suicide organisations – Exit and Dignitas – made it possible for 560 people to end their lives in 2011. This equates to one in three of all suicides in Switzerland.

While the right to die is consistently backed by a majority of the electorate, there are details within the practice of assisted suicide that split opinion, such as the vote in canton Vaud last month over exercising the right to die in a residential care home.

Voters in the French-speaking canton accepted the local government’s proposal to oblige nursing homes and hospitals to accept the practice only when the person in question is suffering from an incurable illness or injury.

Swiss voters OK assisted suicide in nursing home by Charlie Butts, (7/9/12) – The majority vote in the canton of Vaud was 62 percent in favor of bringing assisted suicide into the nursing homes. Rita Marker of the Patients Rights Council tells OneNewsNow the vote forces hospitals and nursing homes to accept assisted suicide.

Legalization of Euthanasia has not altered prevalence – PriMed Journal (7/11/12) – “In conclusion, eight years after the enactment of the Dutch euthanasia law, the incidence of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is comparable with that in the period before the law,” the authors write.


Death with Dignity by Leonard Bernstein, Trinidad Express Newspapers  (7/30/12) – The “playing God” argument is a non-starter. For those who do not believe in a personal, vengeful God, it is meaningless. For those who do (as noted by Peter Singer), “God” allows them to make choices about these matters as about all others in their lives. Religious authorities not only feel that they have the right to set what they consider the moral and ethical parameters, but that their view should prevail for all members of society no matter the individual circumstances of, say, someone’s possibly painful imminent death. However, many others take issue with their edicts and want the autonomy to decide for themselves.


BMA continues to oppose legalizing assisted dying – (6/27/12) – Doctors and medical students decided to maintain their opposition to legalising assisted dying.
The meeting decided not to move to a position of neutrality and also rejected a call to say that assisted dying was a matter for society and not for the medical profession.
Retired Manchester consultant in geriatric medicine Raymond Tallis spoke in favour of changing the BMA stance.
He emphasised that ‘neutrality did not imply indifference’ and ‘the medical profession must retain a central role in ensuring and defining safeguards’.
Professor Tallis said guidelines made it clear that doctors and nurses who helped with assisted dying will currently be prosecuted.
‘Assistance is therefore delegated to amateurs, who have to take on a dreadful responsibility at a time when they are already greatly distressed and may well be incompetent to carry it out,’ he said.

Assisted death or assisted living by Jill Shaw Ruddock – huffingtonpost – (7/3/12) – This week in the UK there is a renewed push by MPs to review the current guidelines regarding assisted suicide on compassionate grounds. Lord Falconer, who heads up The Commission on Assisted Dying reported that the current legal status is inadequate and incoherent. Understandably there are concerns that the elderly could be vulnerable to those who don’t have their best interests at heart.

Promoting caring, not killing by Ruth Bessant, Christian Today (7/2/12) – We are currently seeing a great deal of pressure applied by those wanting to change the law on assisted suicide with increasing discussion about whether care of the dying should include the option for a person to choose to end their own life with medical assistance, so-called physician-assisted suicide (PAS).

Patients dying in hospital in pain and lacking dignity: survey by Rebecca Smitg, Medical Editor, The Telegraph (7/3/12) – The survey, by the Office of National Statistics, found that half of families said hospital nurses did not always treat their dying family member with respect.
Almost a third said the quality of care in hospital was fair or poor and only 35 per cent of families rated pain relief in hospital in the final two days as excellent.
Hospital care was rated worse than that received by patients dying at home, in a care home or in a hospice on almost all of the 59 questions.
It is the first time such a survey has been conducted and responses were received from more than 22,000 families.

Solutions for our care crisis – Letters to (7/2/12)
Report on rally and mass lobby of Parliament to resist euthanasia – Christian Concern 7/4/12 – On 3 June, campaign group Care Not Killing, of which Christian Concern is a member, held a rally and mass lobby of Parliament in order to promote better palliative care and oppose the legalisation of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Their speeches contained a range of arguments against weakening the current laws on assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Delegates later went to Parliament to talk to their MPs about the issues and highlight their opposition to any relaxation of the current laws.

The legalization of assisted suicide– don’t be fooled, it is primarily about money by Dr. Peter Saunders, CEO of Christian Medical Fellowship – National Right to Life News Today (7/4/12) –

Today, according to the Sunday Times, Lord Falconer will publish his new bill on assisted suicide.

In line with the recommendations of his sham ‘Commission on Assisted Dying’ he will push for doctors being given the power to help mentally competent adults with less than one year to live to kill themselves.

There has been surprisingly little media coverage about this event, but Dignity in Dying (the former Voluntary Euthanasia Society) are planning a mass lobby on Parliament tomorrow to launch an ‘enquiry’ into this new bill which they hope will be debated in the New Year.

Over the last six years there have been three failed attempts to legalise assisted suicide in Britain since 2006 all of which have failed due to concerns about public safety.

Right-to-Die groups in England increase lobbying efforts – by Myles Collier, Christian Post (7/5/12) – There is considerable attention being brought to assisted suicide and euthanasia in England recently. Several groups in favor of changing laws concerned with such acts have increased their lobbying of members of the British Parliament.

Dr. Peters Saunders, regarded as the leading advocate of right-to-life supporters, has cautioned that there will be an increase in the level of activity by those individuals and organizations that are pushing for new laws for those who wish to end their lives.

“Their glossy propaganda inserts are spilling out of commercial publications; they are spending hundreds of thousands; and clearly believe this is their year,” Saunders told the Christian Institute.

Draft Assisted Dying Bill is an important step towards a compassionate law on assisted dying– British Humanist Assoc. (7/4/12) – The All Party Parliamentary Group on Choice at the End of Life has launched a consultation on a draft Bill that would enable mentally competent adults with a terminal condition to seek medical assistance to end their life. The consultation has been welcomed by the British Humanist Association (BHA) as an ‘important step towards an ethical and compassionate law on assisted dying that protects the vulnerable’.

The draft Bill largely draws upon the recommendations of the independent Commission on Assisted Dying, which examined the problematic approach to the issue of assisted dying in the UK. At present, assisting another individual to die remains illegal, however the Director of Public Prosecution’s revised prosecuting guidelines recommend that amateur assistance for compassionate reasons should not be prosecuted, and large numbers seek assistance abroad. As a result, assistance continues to occur, but outside of a legal framework of safeguards that protect the vulnerable.

Support of doctor-assisted suicide by Bonnie Gardiner – – (7/5/12) – 69% Britons say law should allow doctors to assist terminally ill to die; 46% if illness not terminal

Over two thirds of the British public have expressed support for the laws on assisted suicide to be changed so that it would be legal for doctors to assist in ending the life of someone suffering a terminal illness, our poll shows.

Support is not as strong for the aided death of patients whose illness is painful and incurable but not terminal, with around half in favour and one third opposed.

Why legalizing assisted suicide for anyone at all will inevitably lead to incremental extension by Peter Saunders – (7/6/12) – Pro-euthanasia activists always make a great play of how their proposals to help people kill themselves are extremely modest and are bound by ‘robust safeguards’.

Dignity in Dying, the former Voluntary Euthanasia Society, is a world leader in this art and their new draft bill, championed by Lord Falconer, is a classic example.

It’s only for the mentally competent, only for the terminally ill, only for adults they say.

There will be no killing of children, disabled people or demented people. It’s all going to be strictly controlled.

In fact it is only the beginning for two main reasons.

Euthanasia could be better than costly social care – pensioner – (7/10/12) – “The big question is: Who is going to pay for it?

“I often think that pensioners want to live in dignity and die in it too, and to that end one has to think about euthanasia.

“A lot of the success of this will rest on how much the social care will cost everybody, because a lot of people think the Government has limitless amounts of money, but it does not.”

In an announcement tomorrow, the Government is due to announce a new policy of national eligibility for free social care by 2015.

Former nurse urges Golders Green MP to back assisted suicide bill by Syma Mohammed, Ham&High (7/13/12) – A former nurse who was awarded an OBE for services to palliative care, is supporting a bill to allow terminally ill patients to have an assisted death.

Harriet Copperman, 67, of Diploma Avenue, East Finchley, lobbied her MP Mike Freer on Wednesday of last week after a draft bill was launched the day before.

Until this year, she was on the steering group of Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD), an action group which supports the bill.

Ms Copperman said: “I spent all my time in care not being in favour of assisted dying.

“While palliative care can help a small population of people, I have come to appreciate assisted dying can be a part of palliative care.”

Legalising mercy killing could pressure the elderly into dying early, claims the writer PD James by Richard Alleyne – (7/15/12) – James, who admits she herself fears a painful and undignified death, said that while a person should be allowed to choose to commit suicide if their life was “intolerable”, she was “less assured” by the idea of allowing others to do it for them.
She said that murder has to remain a “unique crime” and it would be dangerous to water it down by allowing euthanasia.

Breast Cancer Discussion Boards: A place to talk about death and dying issues